Evaluation of Patients with Facial Palsy and Ophthalmic Sequelae: A 23-Year Retrospective Review.

PURPOSE: Facial palsy (FP) can result in serious ophthalmic sequelae including loss of vision. We describe the clinical characteristics of FP patients presenting for ophthalmologic evaluation and the timing for initiating ophthalmologic care. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 96 consecutive FP patients presenting between 1992 and 2015 at a tertiary eye center. The main outcome measures were time interval from the diagnosis of FP and onset of ocular symptoms to the initial ophthalmologic evaluation (IOE), and the severity of exposure keratopathy and eyelid malposition on IOE. RESULTS: The median time interval from the diagnosis of FP to the IOE was 1.6 years (interquartile range; IQR = 0.5-9.2), and from the onset of ocular symptoms to IOE was 0.8 years (IQR = 0.3-2.3). The most common ocular symptoms were dryness (47.9%; n = 46), irritation (39.6%; n = 38), and tearing (30.2%; n = 29). A total of 26.0% (n = 25) of patients were bothered by the appearance of their eyes. Only 13.5% (n = 13) noted change in vision. On IOE, 81.6% (n = 75) of patients had punctate epithelial erosions (PEE), of which 52.3% (n = 35) had moderate to severe PEE, 3.3% (n = 3) had corneal ulcers and 2.2% (n = 2) had corneal abrasions. The average margin-reflex distance 2 was 6.4 mm (SD = 2.4) with average lagophthalmos of 3.5 mm (SD = 3.1). CONCLUSIONS: Among FP patients presenting for ophthalmologic evaluation, exposure keratopathy (as evidenced by PEE and corneal ulcers/abrasions) is highly prevalent and moderately severe on IOE, despite only 13.5% of patients noting decreased vision. These findings underscore the importance of timely and thorough ophthalmologic evaluation of FP patients.

Prevalence of Body Dysmorphic Disorder and Surgeon Diagnostic Accuracy in Facial Plastic and Oculoplastic Surgery Clinics.

IMPORTANCE: Body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) is a relative contraindication for facial plastic surgery, but formal screening is not common in practice. The prevalence of BDD in patients seeking facial plastic surgery is not well documented. OBJECTIVE: To establish the prevalence of BDD across facial plastic and oculoplastic surgery practice settings, and estimate the ability of surgeons to screen for BDD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multicenter prospective study recruited a cohort of 597 patients who presented to academic and private facial plastic and oculoplastic surgery practices from March 2015 to February 2016. METHODS: All patients were screened for BDD using the Body Dysmorphic Disorder Questionnaire (BDDQ). After each clinical encounter, surgeons independently evaluated the likelihood that a participating patient had BDD. Validated instruments were used to assess satisfaction with facial appearance including the FACE-Q, Blepharoplasty Outcomes Evaluation (BOE), Facelift Outcomes Evaluation (FOE), Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation (ROE), and Skin Rejuvenation Outcomes Evaluation (SROE). RESULTS: Across participating practices (9 surgeons, 3 sites), a total of 597 patients were screened for BDD: 342 patients from site 1 (mean [SD] age, 44.2 [16.5] years); 158 patients, site 2 (mean [SD] age, 46.0 [16.2] years), site 3, 97 patients (mean [SD] age, 56.3 [15.5] years). Overall, 58 patients [9.7%] screened positive for BDD by the BDDQ instrument, while only 16 of 402 patients [4.0%] were clinically suspected of BDD by surgeons. A higher percentage of patients presenting for cosmetic surgery (37 of 283 patients [13.1%]) compared with those presenting for reconstructive surgery (21 of 314 patients [6.7%]) screened positive on the BDDQ (odds ratio, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.20-3.68; P = .01). Surgeons were only able to correctly identify 2 of 43 patients (4.7%) who screened positive for BDD on the BDDQ, and the positive likelihood ratio was only 1.19 (95% CI, 0.28-5.07). Patients screening positive for BDD by the BDDQ had lower satisfaction with their appearance as measured by the FACE-Q, ROE, BOE, SROE, and FOE. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Body dysmorphic disorder is a relatively common condition across facial plastic and oculoplastic surgery practice settings. Patients who screen positive on the BDDQ have lower satisfaction with their facial appearance at baseline. Surgeons have a poor ability to screen for patients with BDD when compared with validated screening instruments such as the BDDQ. Routine implementation of validated BDD screening instruments may improve patient care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA.